Triple

T37922249
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Biamonti 247 E945994 entity
Predicate relatedOpusNumber P66233 FINISHED
Object Op. 27 No. 2 — LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Op. 27 No. 2 | Statement: [Biamonti 247, relatedOpusNumber, Op. 27 No. 2]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relatedOpusNumber
Context triple: [Biamonti 247, relatedOpusNumber, Op. 27 No. 2]
  • A. hasOpusNumber chosen
    Indicates that a musical work is associated with a specific opus number assigned to it, typically denoting its place in a composer’s catalog.
  • B. partOfWorkByCatalogueNumber
    Indicates that an item is a component or section of a larger work, identified specifically by its catalogue number.
  • C. cataloguedWithOpera
    Indicates that an item is recorded or documented in association with a specific opera work or opera-related cataloging system.
  • D. seriesNumberOfWorks
    Indicates that an entity is assigned a specific position or sequence number within a series of related works.
  • E. associatedOpera
    Indicates that there is a relationship linking an entity to an opera with which it is connected or related (e.g., as subject, inspiration, or context).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ef2ebd88190be5229f2621070b3 completed May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c903be48190a2fafa53d7d50d42 completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a037a192a008190a9917688a9e804f4 completed May 12, 2026, 7:06 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:20 p.m.