Triple
T37824793
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tapada Real de Vila Viçosa |
E943021
|
entity |
| Predicate | formerUseBy |
P48489
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Portuguese royal family |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Portuguese royal family | Statement: [Tapada Real de Vila Viçosa, formerUseBy, Portuguese royal family]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: formerUseBy Context triple: [Tapada Real de Vila Viçosa, formerUseBy, Portuguese royal family]
-
A.
formerlyUsedBy
chosen
Indicates that an entity was used by another entity in the past but is no longer in use by that entity.
-
B.
historicallyUsedFor
Indicates that something served a particular function or purpose at some point in the past, even if it may no longer be used that way now.
-
C.
wasUsedBy
Indicates that something served as a tool, resource, or means for an agent to perform an action or achieve a result.
-
D.
laterUsedBy
Indicates that something is subsequently utilized or employed by a specified entity at a later time.
-
E.
usedAt
Indicates that something is employed, applied, or utilized at a particular place, time, or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76eea4c8c8190a335aed5955cf2db |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a0120f070b081909b6d1a3d8ee6b80e |
completed | May 11, 2026, 12:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a01209da37481909683e38f264b15ef |
completed | May 11, 2026, 12:19 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:19 p.m.