Triple
T37808050
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Douglas stated the Freeport Doctrine at the Freeport debate |
E942557
|
entity |
| Predicate | challengedDoctrineOf |
P92351
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Dred Scott decision’s implication that territories must allow slavery |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dred Scott decision’s implication that territories must allow slavery | Statement: [Douglas stated the Freeport Doctrine at the Freeport debate, challengedDoctrineOf, Dred Scott decision’s implication that territories must allow slavery]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: challengedDoctrineOf Context triple: [Douglas stated the Freeport Doctrine at the Freeport debate, challengedDoctrineOf, Dred Scott decision’s implication that territories must allow slavery]
-
A.
disputedDoctrine
Indicates that a particular doctrine, teaching, or belief is contested or not universally accepted between parties.
-
B.
legalDoctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
-
C.
doctrineChallenged
chosen
Indicates that a particular doctrine, principle, or set of beliefs is being questioned, disputed, or formally contested.
-
D.
doctrinalConcern
Indicates a relationship where one party has a worry, objection, or issue specifically about the correctness or acceptability of another party’s doctrines or teachings.
-
E.
doctrineOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity is the doctrinal teaching, principle, or belief system associated with, derived from, or formally held by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ee8104c8190ab17133ccd8f86e6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fbb9e8108c8190ae1c7940b1677e95 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fbb141605c8190b9c27d70352522db |
completed | May 6, 2026, 9:23 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:19 p.m.