Triple

T37709244
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Torna Fort E939279 entity
Predicate connectedToFort P37306 FINISHED
Object Rajgad Fort NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rajgad Fort | Statement: [Torna Fort, connectedToFort, Rajgad Fort]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: connectedToFort
Context triple: [Torna Fort, connectedToFort, Rajgad Fort]
  • A. connectedToField
    Indicates that one entity has a direct link, association, or attachment to a specific field within a structure, system, or dataset.
  • B. connectionTo chosen
    Indicates a relationship in which one entity is linked, associated, or otherwise related to another entity.
  • C. reportedConnection
    Indicates that a relationship or link between entities has been asserted or documented by some source, but may not be independently verified.
  • D. connectedToOrganization
    Indicates that an entity has a relationship or association with a particular organization, such as membership, affiliation, or formal linkage.
  • E. connectsBeyond
    Indicates a relationship where one entity forms a link or association that extends past a usual boundary, scope, or intermediary to reach another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76edb49dc8190b951dce9ce6ef789 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ffff262fac8190a26ed0577e1860bd completed May 10, 2026, 3:44 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fffcad7d7c8190a4ad7bb35e33bb75 completed May 10, 2026, 3:34 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.