Triple
T3769430
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pfennig |
E82759
|
entity |
| Predicate | materialVariants |
P618
|
FINISHED |
| Object | copper |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: copper | Statement: [Pfennig, materialVariants, copper]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: materialVariants Context triple: [Pfennig, materialVariants, copper]
-
A.
materialDepicted
Indicates that a work or representation visually portrays or includes a particular material as part of its subject.
-
B.
featuresMaterialFrom
Indicates that one entity incorporates, contains, or is composed of material originating from another entity.
-
C.
material
chosen
Indicates that one entity is physically composed of, made from, or constructed using the substance or material represented by the other entity.
-
D.
bodyVariant
Indicates that one entity is an alternative physical form or version of another entity’s body.
-
E.
designVariant
Indicates that one entity is an alternative design or version derived from or related to another entity’s design.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b207b0081909d2b48843fbd8795 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adcc2f016c81909c2e3c85dbc3c259 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adc04ec36c8190bd5b944d4f4d32aa |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:35 p.m.