Triple
T37665148
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Purpur Block |
E937803
|
entity |
| Predicate | canBePlacedOn |
P200174
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Any solid block |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Any solid block | Statement: [Purpur Block, canBePlacedOn, Any solid block]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canBePlacedOn Context triple: [Purpur Block, canBePlacedOn, Any solid block]
-
A.
canBePlacedUnder
Indicates that one entity is allowed or able to be positioned beneath another entity in a spatial or structural arrangement.
-
B.
designedToPlace
Indicates that something is intentionally created or configured for the purpose of positioning or setting another entity in a specific place or arrangement.
-
C.
canBeAddedTo
Indicates that one entity is capable of being combined or incorporated with another entity, typically without conflict or incompatibility.
-
D.
canHold
Indicates that one entity has the capacity or ability to contain, support, or carry another entity.
-
E.
canBeDisplayedOn
Indicates that something is capable of being shown or rendered on a particular medium, device, or interface.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ed6df7c8190b018e5baea716ceb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff795d25d08190b7584c72be39d309 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff78a90fbc8190a62c57456dc1d4ad |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:10 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ff795c702c8190b00844407f2882af |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:13 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.