Triple

T37611849
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Intermezzo, Op. 118 No. 1 E935803 entity
Predicate setOpusNumber P66233 FINISHED
Object Op. 118 NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Op. 118 | Statement: [Intermezzo, Op. 118 No. 1, setOpusNumber, Op. 118]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: setOpusNumber
Context triple: [Intermezzo, Op. 118 No. 1, setOpusNumber, Op. 118]
  • A. hasOpusNumber chosen
    Indicates that a musical work is associated with a specific opus number assigned to it, typically denoting its place in a composer’s catalog.
  • B. hasOpusSetTitle
    Indicates that an opus (a musical or artistic work) is associated with a specific set title under which it is grouped or published.
  • C. positionInOpus
    Indicates the specific location or ordering of a part or element within a larger work or opus.
  • D. operaNumberInComposerOutput
    Indicates the ordinal position or catalog number assigned to an opera within the complete body of works by a specific composer.
  • E. operaNumberType
    Indicates the type or classification assigned to an opera’s identifying number within a cataloging or numbering system.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ed0a85481909254a8a89090c826 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fbacaf54648190811ea33b34907e8e completed May 6, 2026, 9:03 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fba883f770819091059c6f6c6af9f7 completed May 6, 2026, 8:45 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.