Triple
T375979
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Greatest Love of All |
E8373
|
entity |
| Predicate | WhitneyHoustonVersion.chartPeakUK |
P13093
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 8 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 8 | Statement: [Greatest Love of All, WhitneyHoustonVersion.chartPeakUK, 8]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: WhitneyHoustonVersion.chartPeakUK Context triple: [Greatest Love of All, WhitneyHoustonVersion.chartPeakUK, 8]
-
A.
isSignatureSongOf
Indicates that a particular song is widely recognized as the most iconic or defining song associated with a specific artist or group.
-
B.
hasSignatureSong
Indicates that an artist or performer is especially associated with a particular song that is widely recognized as their defining or most iconic work.
-
C.
hasSpecialSong
Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a particular song that is unique, distinctive, or specially designated for it.
-
D.
peakPopularity
Indicates the time or context in which something reaches its highest level of popularity relative to other times or contexts.
-
E.
hasThemeSong
Indicates that an entity is associated with or characterized by a particular theme song.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7f2ec648190b42bc7db424f8109 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ec169a848190a577aa093c878839 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e96216048190873ae533fa5b864d |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2ebcb1b2c8190a68bb3bad600c227 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:21 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.