Triple

T3758433
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Public Prosecution Service of Egypt E82102 entity
Predicate canAppeal P47212 FINISHED
Object court decisions in criminal cases LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: court decisions in criminal cases | Statement: [Public Prosecution Service of Egypt, canAppeal, court decisions in criminal cases]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canAppeal
Context triple: [Public Prosecution Service of Egypt, canAppeal, court decisions in criminal cases]
  • A. canBeAppealedTo
    Indicates that a decision, action, or authority is subject to being challenged or reviewed by a higher or alternative authority through an appeal process.
  • B. appeal
    Indicates that one party formally requests a higher authority to review, reconsider, or overturn a prior decision, judgment, or outcome.
  • C. hasAppealsTo chosen
    Indicates that one entity formally challenges or seeks review of a decision, judgment, or outcome through another entity or process.
  • D. canRemand
    Indicates that an authority (such as a court or decision-maker) has the power to send a case or matter back to a lower body or earlier stage for further action or reconsideration.
  • E. appealsFor
    Indicates that one entity formally requests support, intervention, or a favorable decision from another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad8b1db40081908b61ffa6b78afd4d completed March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adcbc20b20819095fedf803aadc53a completed March 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adc04c851c8190ae5eaebf36df539b completed March 8, 2026, 6:30 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:35 p.m.