Triple

T37581835
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Le Saint prend l’affût E934988 entity
Predicate featuresFictionalGentlemanThief P61174 FINISHED
Object Simon Templar E467659 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Simon Templar | Statement: [Le Saint prend l’affût, featuresFictionalGentlemanThief, Simon Templar]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: featuresFictionalGentlemanThief
Context triple: [Le Saint prend l’affût, featuresFictionalGentlemanThief, Simon Templar]
  • A. featuresFictionalMurdererType
    Indicates that the subject includes or portrays a specific type or category of fictional murderer.
  • B. hasThiefCharacter chosen
    Indicates that an entity includes or features a character whose role or identity is that of a thief.
  • C. hasFictionalDetective
    Indicates that one entity (typically a work or series) features or includes a fictional detective character as part of its content.
  • D. featuresCharacterWith
    Indicates that one entity (such as a work or product) includes or presents a particular character as part of its content.
  • E. featuresPrivateDetective
    Indicates that the subject includes or involves a private detective as a notable element or character.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ece61dc8190a0ab33f8d87d0a7e completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c8efcd4819088c2aeead65d93df completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a40cda96a6081909689503810bc81a7 completed June 28, 2026, 7:30 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a037a1553e08190bb7424c448cb1f33 completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:17 p.m.