Triple
T37546928
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cramér–Lundberg model |
E933487
|
entity |
| Predicate | aggregateClaimsProcess |
P188251
|
FINISHED |
| Object | compound Poisson process |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: compound Poisson process | Statement: [Cramér–Lundberg model, aggregateClaimsProcess, compound Poisson process]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: aggregateClaimsProcess Context triple: [Cramér–Lundberg model, aggregateClaimsProcess, compound Poisson process]
-
A.
handlesClaimsFrom
Indicates that one entity is responsible for processing, managing, or resolving claims submitted by another entity.
-
B.
recognizedClaimsOver
Indicates that one party has formally acknowledged or accepted the validity of certain claims made by another party.
-
C.
claimsToBe
Indicates that one entity asserts or declares itself to have a particular identity, role, or property, regardless of whether this assertion is true.
-
D.
claimsToMark
Indicates that one entity asserts or alleges that it has marked, labeled, or designated another entity in some specified way.
-
E.
claimProcess
Indicates the process by which a claim (such as an insurance or service claim) is received, evaluated, and resolved between involved parties.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76eca55bc8190acf25741793d5dac |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fba5eec0448190a5e6f0c43fdcd0e3 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 8:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fba34edd548190bfa980e6e16e0a88 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 8:23 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fba5ee00fc81909be7b947a3f95034 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 8:34 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:17 p.m.