Triple

T37536201
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda E933202 entity
Predicate arrestWarrantIssued P188213 FINISHED
Object 2006 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2006 | Statement: [Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda, arrestWarrantIssued, 2006]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: arrestWarrantIssued
Context triple: [Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda, arrestWarrantIssued, 2006]
  • A. arrestIs
    Indicates that one entity performs the action of arresting or taking another entity into legal custody.
  • B. arrestedFor
    Indicates that an authority has taken someone into custody because they are suspected or accused of committing a specified offense or wrongdoing.
  • C. arrestedWith
    Indicates that two or more individuals were arrested at the same time and in connection with the same incident or operation.
  • D. arrestResult
    Indicates that an arrest action has occurred and specifies the outcome or consequence resulting from that arrest.
  • E. hasReasonForArrest
    Indicates that an arrest is associated with a specific reason or cause.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ec999288190ae26ec7b6aea7046 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fba5eec0448190a5e6f0c43fdcd0e3 completed May 6, 2026, 8:34 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fba34edd548190bfa980e6e16e0a88 completed May 6, 2026, 8:23 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fba5ee00fc81909be7b947a3f95034 completed May 6, 2026, 8:34 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:17 p.m.