Triple

T3742385
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dartmouth College v. Woodward E79731 entity
Predicate hasFullName P16 FINISHED
Object Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward E79731 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward | Statement: [Dartmouth College v. Woodward, hasFullName, Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward
Context triple: [Dartmouth College v. Woodward, hasFullName, Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward]
  • A. Dartmouth College v. Woodward chosen
    Dartmouth College v. Woodward is an 1819 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the protection of corporate charters as contracts under the Constitution, limiting states’ power to alter them.
  • B. Alden v. Maine
    Alden v. Maine is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded state sovereign immunity by holding that states are generally immune from private suits for damages in their own courts under federal law.
  • C. Cooley v. Board of Wardens
    Cooley v. Board of Wardens is an 1852 U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the scope of the Commerce Clause by allowing states to regulate certain local aspects of commerce, such as port pilotage, without violating federal authority.
  • D. Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
    Martin v. Hunter's Lessee is an 1816 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the Court's authority to review state court decisions on federal law, reinforcing federal judicial supremacy.
  • E. Cohens v. Virginia
    Cohens v. Virginia is an 1821 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed the Court’s authority to review state criminal proceedings involving federal law, strengthening federal judicial power over the states.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad8b115610819095b02007da5ca3cb completed March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adcb563fac8190b6a55580d0386e8a completed March 8, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b4db29b2288190932923a6bf1a7e8e completed March 14, 2026, 3:51 a.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:34 p.m.