Triple
T37266448
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Great Gazoo |
E924397
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToBarneyRubble |
P205812
|
FINISHED |
| Object | invisible companion |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: invisible companion | Statement: [The Great Gazoo, relationshipToBarneyRubble, invisible companion]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToBarneyRubble Context triple: [The Great Gazoo, relationshipToBarneyRubble, invisible companion]
-
A.
relationshipToBenny
Indicates the specific type of personal or social relationship that an entity has with Benny.
-
B.
relationshipToHamm
Indicates that one entity stands in a specified relationship to the entity referred to as Hamm.
-
C.
relationshipToHenry
Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection that an entity has to Henry.
-
D.
relationToBabo
Indicates a relationship or connection that an entity has to the person or entity referred to as "Babo."
-
E.
relationshipToTheDude
Indicates the specific type of personal or social relationship that one entity has to the individual referred to as "the Dude."
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76eabd6c481909d414a80a1345c98 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037cad051c8190b28b354b89208574 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a037a11efc08190bb7cacc1325b4dc6 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a037c842b2c819082f1d2db995ac2eb |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:15 p.m.