Triple
T37258670
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Young diagram |
E924200
|
entity |
| Predicate | conjugationCorrespondsTo |
P187349
|
FINISHED |
| Object | transposing rows and columns |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: transposing rows and columns | Statement: [Young diagram, conjugationCorrespondsTo, transposing rows and columns]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conjugationCorrespondsTo Context triple: [Young diagram, conjugationCorrespondsTo, transposing rows and columns]
-
A.
isConjugatedTo
Indicates that two verb forms are related as different inflectional variants of the same verb through conjugation.
-
B.
conjugate
Indicates that one entity is a grammatical or mathematical counterpart of another, linked by a specific transformation such as verb inflection or complex-number pairing.
-
C.
conjugationType
Indicates the specific pattern or class of inflectional changes a verb follows when it is conjugated.
-
D.
conjugateTo
Indicates that one entity can be transformed into the other by a specific equivalence operation (such as similarity or group conjugation), so they are equivalent up to that transformation.
-
E.
hasConjugateConcept
Indicates that one concept is the conjugate (e.g., complex, algebraic, or structurally dual counterpart) of another concept within a given formal system.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76eabd6c481909d414a80a1345c98 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fb4134225081909fd60703b8cae397 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 1:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fb35bf767081908de8345358ca7f44 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 12:36 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fb41333b548190912cb238ffc271c9 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 1:25 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:15 p.m.