Triple

T37150016
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Avalanche consensus E920337 entity
Predicate instanceOf P0 FINISHED
Object probabilistic consensus protocol C41035 CONCEPT FINISHED

How this triple was built (1 step)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

CD Concept disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: probabilistic consensus protocol
Context triple: [Avalanche consensus, instanceOf, probabilistic consensus protocol]
  • A. fault-tolerant consensus protocol
    A fault-tolerant consensus protocol is a distributed algorithm that enables a group of nodes to reliably agree on a shared state or value even when some nodes fail or behave maliciously.
  • B. distributed consensus algorithm chosen
    A distributed consensus algorithm is a protocol that enables a group of independent, networked nodes to reliably agree on a single shared value or state, even in the presence of failures or unreliable communication.
  • C. theorem in distributed computing
    A theorem in distributed computing is a formally proven statement that characterizes fundamental limits, guarantees, or behaviors of distributed systems under specified models, assumptions, and failure conditions.
  • D. consensus-based decision-making process
    A consensus-based decision-making process is a collaborative method in which all participants work together to reach a mutually acceptable agreement that everyone can support or at least live with, rather than relying on majority rule.
  • E. proof-of-work system
    A proof-of-work system is a consensus mechanism in which participants must perform and verifiably demonstrate computationally expensive work to gain the right to add new records or blocks, thereby securing the system against abuse.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (1 batch)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e9f87c08190b4c8f7fafbd8345a completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:15 p.m.