Triple

T37149573
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject iPhone 5 and later (non-USB-C models) E920326 entity
Predicate includesModels P197425 FINISHED
Object iPhone 5 E920324 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: iPhone 5 | Statement: [iPhone 5 and later (non-USB-C models), includesModels, iPhone 5]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includesModels
Context triple: [iPhone 5 and later (non-USB-C models), includesModels, iPhone 5]
  • A. includesModelsFrom
    Indicates that one collection, set, or group contains models that originate from or are derived from another source or collection.
  • B. usesModelsType
    Indicates that one entity employs or relies on a specific type or category of models in its operation or behavior.
  • C. hasModels chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses, defines, or is associated with one or more models (such as conceptual, mathematical, or data models).
  • D. hasModelIn
    Indicates that an entity is represented or instantiated as a model within a specified context, system, or container.
  • E. includedWith
    Indicates that one entity is provided or packaged together as part of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e9f87c08190b4c8f7fafbd8345a completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c8e2c648190a65fc9c7872861af completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a4043ae3c00819082449a5ee69368e0 completed June 27, 2026, 9:42 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a037a11efc08190bb7cacc1325b4dc6 completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:15 p.m.