Triple
T37119360
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | USS John C. Butler |
E919204
|
entity |
| Predicate | opponentCommanderAtBattleOffSamar |
P188844
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Takeo Kurita |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Takeo Kurita | Statement: [USS John C. Butler, opponentCommanderAtBattleOffSamar, Takeo Kurita]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: opponentCommanderAtBattleOffSamar Context triple: [USS John C. Butler, opponentCommanderAtBattleOffSamar, Takeo Kurita]
-
A.
opponentAtBattleOffSamar
Indicates that one entity served as an opposing force to another during the Battle off Samar.
-
B.
opponentAtSurigaoStrait
Indicates that one entity was the opposing force of another in the Battle of Surigao Strait.
-
C.
commandingOfficerAtManilaBay
Indicates that one entity served as the commanding officer at the Battle of Manila Bay.
-
D.
commandingOfficerAtBattleOfIquique
Indicates that one entity served as the commanding officer of the other entity during the Battle of Iquique.
-
E.
navalCommanderAtBattleOfNavarino
Indicates that a person served as a naval commander participating in the Battle of Navarino.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e9c57148190ba789dd059645bb9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fbad1e94988190b86d447a68e65067 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 9:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fba881b8e0819094790935152b99a1 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 8:45 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fbad1b3ba08190ad69e21461333f2e |
completed | May 6, 2026, 9:05 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:15 p.m.