Triple
T37119359
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | USS John C. Butler |
E919204
|
entity |
| Predicate | opponentAtBattleOffSamar |
P188499
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Japanese Center Force |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Japanese Center Force | Statement: [USS John C. Butler, opponentAtBattleOffSamar, Japanese Center Force]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: opponentAtBattleOffSamar Context triple: [USS John C. Butler, opponentAtBattleOffSamar, Japanese Center Force]
-
A.
opponentAtSurigaoStrait
Indicates that one entity was the opposing force of another in the Battle of Surigao Strait.
-
B.
commandingOfficerAtManilaBay
Indicates that one entity served as the commanding officer at the Battle of Manila Bay.
-
C.
finalEngagementOpponentShip
Indicates that a ship is the opposing vessel faced in the final engagement or battle.
-
D.
opponentAtTrafalgar
Indicates that one entity was an opposing side or adversary of the other in the Battle of Trafalgar.
-
E.
opponentInBattleOfTheRiverPlate
Indicates that two entities were opposing sides facing each other in the Battle of the River Plate.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e9c57148190ba789dd059645bb9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fba78aca4c8190b8f1831e8cc04e06 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 8:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fba34a65a4819088bac6c17542d71c |
completed | May 6, 2026, 8:23 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fba789c1188190973a919bfe2871f3 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 8:41 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:15 p.m.