Triple
T371049
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Miranda v. Arizona |
E8268
|
entity |
| Predicate | requiredWarning |
P2399
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Right to remain silent |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Right to remain silent | Statement: [Miranda v. Arizona, requiredWarning, Right to remain silent]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: requiredWarning Context triple: [Miranda v. Arizona, requiredWarning, Right to remain silent]
-
A.
warnsAbout
chosen
Indicates that one entity alerts or cautions another entity about a potential danger, risk, or problem.
-
B.
requiresShowing
Indicates that one entity must be displayed or made visible as a prerequisite or condition for another entity, action, or state.
-
C.
requires
Indicates that one entity must exist, occur, or be satisfied before another entity can exist, occur, or be carried out.
-
D.
mayReportTo
Indicates that one entity is permitted or allowed to have a reporting relationship to another entity, such as an employee being allowed to report to a particular manager.
-
E.
requiresNotificationFrom
Indicates that one entity must receive a notification from another entity before or when a certain condition, event, or action occurs.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7f2ec648190b42bc7db424f8109 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ebff472881909fad81d597425ea6 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e960d880819084b3df4e5137a1e2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.