Triple
T37087808
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | High Court |
E918336
|
entity |
| Predicate | highestCourtLevelWithin |
P195171
|
FINISHED |
| Object | State of India |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: State of India | Statement: [High Court, highestCourtLevelWithin, State of India]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: highestCourtLevelWithin Context triple: [High Court, highestCourtLevelWithin, State of India]
-
A.
highestTrialCourtLevel
Indicates the relationship where a specified court is identified as the top or final-level trial court within a given judicial hierarchy or jurisdiction.
-
B.
highestCourtType
Indicates the type or category of the supreme or top-level court that has ultimate judicial authority over a given jurisdiction or case.
-
C.
highestCourtOf
Indicates that one entity is the supreme judicial authority or top-level court within the jurisdiction or legal system of another entity.
-
D.
highestTrialCourtOf
Indicates that one entity serves as the supreme or final-level trial court within the judicial hierarchy of another entity (such as a jurisdiction or legal system).
-
E.
highestCourtOfAppealFor
Indicates that one entity serves as the ultimate judicial authority to which decisions from the other entity can be appealed.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e9952b88190a6fe01ba01476520 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fda94697c4819081291967202248be |
completed | May 8, 2026, 9:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fda5973fcc8190a57daef31fb70a49 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 8:57 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fda945e1e08190bf923fcd4d2c548a |
completed | May 8, 2026, 9:13 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:14 p.m.