Triple
T3707312
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Illusions of Progress |
E80923
|
entity |
| Predicate | critiquesConcept |
P50921
|
FINISHED |
| Object | linear historical development |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: linear historical development | Statement: [Illusions of Progress, critiquesConcept, linear historical development]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: critiquesConcept Context triple: [Illusions of Progress, critiquesConcept, linear historical development]
-
A.
aimsToCritique
Indicates an intention to analyze and point out faults, limitations, or weaknesses in something.
-
B.
criticizedFor
Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval or negative judgment of another entity specifically because of a particular action, quality, or outcome.
-
C.
featuredConcept
Indicates that one concept is highlighted or given special prominence relative to others in a particular context.
-
D.
hasCriticalConcept
Indicates that one entity includes, depends on, or is defined by a key concept that is essential to understanding or functioning of another entity.
-
E.
criticizesSource
Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval of, or negative judgment about, the content, behavior, or credibility of another entity that is treated as a source.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b1793888190a5f70e4b21dc05a1 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc57edd748190a006e15fa0248679 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adc041a8608190a2d543dab6d2ef6c |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69adc133ef50819094c2b971f31f1615 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:33 p.m.