Triple
T37048439
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gengbe |
E916983
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gbe language variety |
C62747
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Gbe language variety Context triple: [Gengbe, instanceOf, Gbe language variety]
-
A.
regional variety of the Bambara language
A regional variety of the Bambara language is a geographically or socially defined form of Bambara that differs from other varieties in pronunciation, vocabulary, and sometimes grammar while remaining mutually intelligible.
-
B.
Volta–Niger language
A Volta–Niger language is a member of a proposed branch of the Niger–Congo language family spoken primarily in southern Nigeria and neighboring regions, characterized by significant lexical and grammatical diversity among its constituent languages.
-
C.
Fula language variety
A Fula language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Fula (Fulfulde/Pulaar/Pular) language distinguished by its phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Fula continuum.
-
D.
regional variety of the Nupe language
A regional variety of the Nupe language is a geographically or socially defined form of Nupe that exhibits distinct phonological, lexical, or grammatical features while remaining mutually intelligible with other Nupe varieties.
-
E.
Central African Banda language
Central African Banda language is a group of closely related Ubangian languages spoken primarily by the Banda people in the Central African Republic and neighboring regions.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e94d0308190a3f06890e133c88e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:14 p.m.