Triple

T36981068
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 2002 Western Conference Finals E914828 entity
Predicate winnerFinalsResult P191927 FINISHED
Object Los Angeles Lakers defeated New Jersey Nets 4–0 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Los Angeles Lakers defeated New Jersey Nets 4–0 | Statement: [2002 Western Conference Finals, winnerFinalsResult, Los Angeles Lakers defeated New Jersey Nets 4–0]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: winnerFinalsResult
Context triple: [2002 Western Conference Finals, winnerFinalsResult, Los Angeles Lakers defeated New Jersey Nets 4–0]
  • A. winnerManager
    Indicates that one entity is the manager or supervisor of another entity who is the winner in a given context or competition.
  • B. winnerState
    Indicates the state or condition of an entity that has achieved victory or been declared the winner in a given context.
  • C. winnerDam
    Indicates that the subject entity is the dam (mother) of an offspring that has won a specified race or competition.
  • D. winnerRound
    Indicates that an entity is the one who won a particular round in a multi-round event or competition.
  • E. winnerType
    Indicates the category or kind of winner associated with an event, competition, or outcome.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e8dd0408190b8b46da118ea5128 completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fcef654d588190b29ecc76678d1aa0 completed May 7, 2026, 8 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcecdb97f48190b382b7d13be92dc0 completed May 7, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fcef636dfc819085cf91323f2e4edd completed May 7, 2026, 8 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:14 p.m.