Triple
T36915973
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Japan–United Kingdom relations |
E913045
|
entity |
| Predicate | defenceCooperation |
P32971
|
FINISHED |
| Object | joint military exercises |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: joint military exercises | Statement: [Japan–United Kingdom relations, defenceCooperation, joint military exercises]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: defenceCooperation Context triple: [Japan–United Kingdom relations, defenceCooperation, joint military exercises]
-
A.
militaryCooperation
chosen
Indicates a collaborative relationship in which entities coordinate, support, or jointly conduct military activities, operations, or planning.
-
B.
hasMilitaryCooperationAt
Indicates that two or more entities engage in military cooperation at or in relation to a specific location or venue.
-
C.
defencePartner
Indicates a relationship where one entity collaborates with or supports another in matters of defense or security.
-
D.
cooperationAgainst
Indicates a collaborative relationship in which two or more entities work together in opposition to a shared target or adversary.
-
E.
partyForDefense
Indicates a legal relationship where an entity serves as or is designated as the defending party in a legal proceeding or dispute.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e885b848190bad82c87e9525486 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fbc9d1dba881908c399b8e1dc13ce2 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 11:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fbc8ec03ac8190a757563f96fab283 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 11:04 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:13 p.m.