Triple
T36870968
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Great Dissenter |
E911220
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableDissentTheme |
P7671
|
FINISHED |
| Object | color-blind Constitution |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: color-blind Constitution | Statement: [The Great Dissenter, notableDissentTheme, color-blind Constitution]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableDissentTheme Context triple: [The Great Dissenter, notableDissentTheme, color-blind Constitution]
-
A.
kaganDissentTheme
Indicates that the relationship captures a central theme or focus of Justice Kagan’s dissenting opinion in a legal case.
-
B.
notableTheme
chosen
Indicates that a particular theme is prominently featured in, or strongly associated with, an entity such as a work, event, or body of content.
-
C.
dissentingJustice
Indicates that a particular justice disagrees with the majority opinion or decision in a legal case.
-
D.
hasDissentingJustice
Indicates that within a judicial decision or ruling, there exists at least one justice who formally disagrees with the majority opinion.
-
E.
sotomayorDissentTheme
Indicates that the relationship captures a central theme or focus present in a dissenting opinion authored by Justice Sonia Sotomayor.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e82339881909607a65c0503d941 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c8e2c648190a65fc9c7872861af |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a037a0e039481908a4a2666f76c5363 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:13 p.m.