Triple
T3684658
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Harry the Hawk |
E78194
|
entity |
| Predicate | colorSchemeMatches |
P29272
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Atlanta Hawks team colors |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Atlanta Hawks team colors | Statement: [Harry the Hawk, colorSchemeMatches, Atlanta Hawks team colors]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: colorSchemeMatches Context triple: [Harry the Hawk, colorSchemeMatches, Atlanta Hawks team colors]
-
A.
hasColourScheme
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular set or pattern of colors used in its design or appearance.
-
B.
isShadeOf
Indicates that one entity represents a specific tonal or color variation derived from or closely related to another entity.
-
C.
capeColor
Indicates the color attribute associated with a cape worn or possessed by an entity.
-
D.
hasColorSymbol
Indicates that one entity is associated with another entity that serves as its representative or symbolic color.
-
E.
colorHasMeaning
Indicates that a particular color is associated with or conveys a specific meaning, symbolism, or significance.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85e285a081908f8cbfa9e2ed9b75 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc4c49b408190bc800bcf9745fe4f |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adb84be1fc81909721c871babb4633 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:26 p.m.