Triple

T36806331
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject A Fantasia in the Russian Manner on English Themes E909462 entity
Predicate indicatesStyle P1609 FINISHED
Object fantasia LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: fantasia | Statement: [A Fantasia in the Russian Manner on English Themes, indicatesStyle, fantasia]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: indicatesStyle
Context triple: [A Fantasia in the Russian Manner on English Themes, indicatesStyle, fantasia]
  • A. hasStyle chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular style or manner.
  • B. usesAsStyleOf
    Indicates that one entity adopts or applies another entity as a stylistic model, method, or manner of expression.
  • C. styleFor
    Indicates a relationship where one entity defines, specifies, or is used as the style or styling configuration applied to another entity.
  • D. styleHeldBy
    Indicates that a particular style, design, or aesthetic is possessed, used, or embodied by a specific entity.
  • E. conveysStyle
    Indicates that one entity expresses, communicates, or embodies a particular style through its form, behavior, or presentation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e7cbbf48190891227b14d041139 completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fb2e940d5c8190bceae77daf4ef512 completed May 6, 2026, 12:05 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f9fec70bd881909c658a3c5020318b completed May 5, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:13 p.m.