Triple
T36772
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Battle of Okinawa |
E728
|
entity |
| Predicate | strategicOutcome |
P1421
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Allied capture of Okinawa |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Allied capture of Okinawa | Statement: [Battle of Okinawa, strategicOutcome, Allied capture of Okinawa]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: strategicOutcome Context triple: [Battle of Okinawa, strategicOutcome, Allied capture of Okinawa]
-
A.
historicalOutcome
chosen
Indicates the result or consequence that an event, action, or situation produced in a historical context.
-
B.
notableOutcome
Indicates that an action, event, or entity leads to or is associated with a significant, noteworthy result or consequence.
-
C.
result
Indicates that one entity is produced, caused, or brought about as an outcome or consequence of another entity or process.
-
D.
tactic
Indicates a strategic method or maneuver employed by one entity to influence, counter, or gain advantage over another in a specific context.
-
E.
decidesOn
Indicates that an agent makes a choice or determination regarding a particular option, issue, or course of action.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a247a8f6c08190bac804906d62ed5a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24bb753f081909cd8b25cfb8e08af |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24ab4a6908190b6f355415ffe7948 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:53 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:46 a.m.