Triple
T36768745
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | William Adams |
E908416
|
entity |
| Predicate | grantedFief |
P88239
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Miura Peninsula |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Miura Peninsula | Statement: [William Adams, grantedFief, Miura Peninsula]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: grantedFief Context triple: [William Adams, grantedFief, Miura Peninsula]
-
A.
grantedFiefOf
chosen
Indicates that one party has been formally given control or ownership of a fief (landed estate) by another authority.
-
B.
heldFief
Indicates that one entity possessed or controlled a fief (a feudal estate or tenure) from another entity.
-
C.
formerFiefOf
Indicates that a territory or domain was previously under the control or jurisdiction of a specified lord, ruler, or political entity as a fief.
-
D.
typeOfFeudalGrant
Indicates the specific kind or category of feudal grant that characterizes the relationship between a grantor and a grantee within a feudal system.
-
E.
landGrantedBy
Indicates that one party has given or transferred legal rights to a piece of land to another party.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e786ba481909cdcf6cf6b39dd32 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcc4b700748190ae00b21d09c96695 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 4:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcb0f9d3d881908a049475182fb039 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 3:34 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:12 p.m.