Triple

T3673920
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cum negotium E77943 entity
Predicate reflectsApproachOf P3935 FINISHED
Object legalistic governance LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: legalistic governance | Statement: [Cum negotium, reflectsApproachOf, legalistic governance]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reflectsApproachOf
Context triple: [Cum negotium, reflectsApproachOf, legalistic governance]
  • A. includesApproach
    Indicates that one entity incorporates, utilizes, or is characterized by a particular method, strategy, or approach in relation to another entity or context.
  • B. reflects chosen
    Indicates that one entity (often a surface, medium, or representation) throws back, mirrors, or otherwise shows an image, property, or state of another entity.
  • C. approaches
    Indicates that one entity moves closer in position or state to another entity or reference point.
  • D. hasApproachType
    Indicates the specific method, strategy, or manner in which an action, process, or interaction is carried out or approached.
  • E. hasApproachStructure
    Indicates that one entity possesses or includes an approach structure that provides access or a path leading to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85e083008190b2e1b7085fe500bd completed March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adc45fbd1c819099023791452f1beb completed March 8, 2026, 6:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adb84a20288190a092e4a1b045fe3f completed March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:25 p.m.