Triple

T3669925
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject High Court of Azad Jammu and Kashmir E77852 entity
Predicate relationToPakistanJudiciary P50053 FINISHED
Object Separate from High Courts of Pakistan LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Separate from High Courts of Pakistan | Statement: [High Court of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, relationToPakistanJudiciary, Separate from High Courts of Pakistan]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationToPakistanJudiciary
Context triple: [High Court of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, relationToPakistanJudiciary, Separate from High Courts of Pakistan]
  • A. relatedLegalSystem
    Indicates that there is an association or connection between two legal systems, such as influence, similarity, shared origin, or mutual relevance.
  • B. relationToIslam
    Indicates how an entity is connected or related to Islam, such as through belief, practice, affiliation, or influence.
  • C. judicialBody
    Indicates that an entity serves as a court or tribunal with authority to adjudicate legal disputes or interpret and apply the law.
  • D. relationshipToAllPalestineGovernment
    Indicates the nature or type of relationship an entity has with the All-Palestine Government.
  • E. relatedCase
    Indicates that one legal case is connected or associated with another case, such as through shared facts, parties, issues, or procedural history.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85e083008190b2e1b7085fe500bd completed March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adc42b3f94819091d51e488bc3f2f2 completed March 8, 2026, 6:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adb84a20288190a092e4a1b045fe3f completed March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69adb8e4ba948190a9b777cf7f788b96 completed March 8, 2026, 5:59 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:25 p.m.