Triple
T36619114
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lord Hastings |
E903683
|
entity |
| Predicate | actualGuilt |
P186215
|
FINISHED |
| Object | innocent of treason |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: innocent of treason | Statement: [Lord Hastings, actualGuilt, innocent of treason]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: actualGuilt Context triple: [Lord Hastings, actualGuilt, innocent of treason]
-
A.
guiltyOf
Indicates that an entity has been judged or determined to have committed a particular offense, crime, or wrongful act.
-
B.
revealsGuiltOf
Indicates that one entity exposes or makes evident the guilt or culpability of another entity.
-
C.
accusedOf
Indicates that one entity has formally alleged or claimed that another entity committed a specific wrongdoing or offense.
-
D.
actuallyInnocentOf
Indicates that an entity is truly not responsible for or did not commit the action, offense, or wrongdoing in question, regardless of prior accusations or judgments.
-
E.
accusedIn
Indicates that a person or entity is formally charged with wrongdoing in a particular case, proceeding, or context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e6960e4819092047756ceb9a17e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7cabacc1481909e839454ce1057f7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7c8999a348190abc1895eaa6e036d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:13 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f7c9f4c7c48190ba918d8d5dc8dfd9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:19 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:11 p.m.