Triple

T3660916
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Silas E77644 entity
Predicate moralAmbiguity P47751 FINISHED
Object depicted as both victim and perpetrator LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: depicted as both victim and perpetrator | Statement: [Silas, moralAmbiguity, depicted as both victim and perpetrator]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: moralAmbiguity
Context triple: [Silas, moralAmbiguity, depicted as both victim and perpetrator]
  • A. moralImplication
    Indicates that one situation, action, or state of affairs entails or suggests a particular moral judgment, obligation, or ethical consequence.
  • B. moralTheme
    Indicates that a work, event, or situation embodies or conveys a particular ethical lesson, value, or moral principle.
  • C. moralTone
    Indicates the evaluative moral quality or ethical character expressed in or associated with an action, statement, or situation.
  • D. derivesMoralityFrom
    Indicates that one entity bases or grounds its moral principles, judgments, or ethical framework on another entity.
  • E. hasMoralCharacteristic chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses a particular moral quality, trait, or ethical attribute.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85dfc4dc8190a441864202ab2a7a completed March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adc3d6fa188190a6db5bdae7083573 completed March 8, 2026, 6:45 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adb847e9d881909dad2ffd0f3b6c15 completed March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:25 p.m.