Triple

T36596902
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Good Women E902826 entity
Predicate equivalentClass P6530 FINISHED
Object Perfectae LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Perfectae | Statement: [Good Women, equivalentClass, Perfectae]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: equivalentClass
Context triple: [Good Women, equivalentClass, Perfectae]
  • A. hasEquivalenceClass
    Indicates that something belongs to, or is associated with, a group of entities that are considered equivalent under a specified relation.
  • B. equivalentTo chosen
    Indicates that two entities represent the same concept, value, or state, and can be treated as interchangeable in the given context.
  • C. equivalentIn
    Indicates that two entities are considered logically or functionally the same in meaning, status, or effect within a given context.
  • D. equivalentGrade
    Indicates that two grades are considered equal in value or standing within a given grading system.
  • E. hasEquivalent
    Indicates that two entities are considered equal in value, meaning, or function within a given context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e66b7b88190848f7a3e1188915f completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7c371931c8190afb1d4dd5157f92c completed May 3, 2026, 9:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7c1baf25c8190a78dd54a400d2c50 completed May 3, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:11 p.m.