Triple

T36558682
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kwisa River E901764 entity
Predicate historicalBoundaryOf P47008 FINISHED
Object Silesia NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Silesia | Statement: [Kwisa River, historicalBoundaryOf, Silesia]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalBoundaryOf
Context triple: [Kwisa River, historicalBoundaryOf, Silesia]
  • A. historicBoundaryFor chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as a historical boundary or border associated with another entity, typically reflecting past territorial or administrative limits.
  • B. historicallyPartOf
    Indicates that one entity was formerly a component, region, or subdivision of another entity during a past historical period, but is not necessarily part of it in the present.
  • C. hasHistoricalBoundaryChanges
    Indicates that the boundaries of an entity have been altered at some point in its history.
  • D. historicalRegionCorrespondsTo
    Indicates that a historical region matches or aligns with a specific region, territory, or administrative unit in terms of location, extent, or identity.
  • E. geographicBoundary
    Indicates that one entity serves as a limiting border or edge that defines the geographic extent or separation of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e634e9481908c9ba1b87ab87c26 completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a013a251b4081908b43d85dd95586c5 completed May 11, 2026, 2:08 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0137e4ea988190812173a5ff044098 completed May 11, 2026, 1:59 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:11 p.m.