Triple
T36553471
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Secure Shell (SSH) Transport Layer Protocol |
E901635
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | transport layer protocol in SSH architecture |
C992
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: transport layer protocol in SSH architecture Context triple: [Secure Shell (SSH) Transport Layer Protocol, instanceOf, transport layer protocol in SSH architecture]
-
A.
transport layer protocol
chosen
A transport layer protocol is a communication protocol that provides end-to-end data transfer services between applications across networked devices, handling functions like segmentation, reliability, flow control, and multiplexing.
-
B.
session layer protocol
A session layer protocol is a network communication protocol that establishes, manages, and terminates logical connections (sessions) between applications, handling dialog control, synchronization, and orderly data exchange.
-
C.
second-layer protocol
A second-layer protocol is a communication protocol that operates on top of a lower-level (first-layer) protocol to provide additional functionality such as reliability, security, or abstraction for higher-level applications.
-
D.
transport layer security vulnerability
A transport layer security vulnerability is a weakness in the protocols, configurations, or implementations that protect data in transit, allowing attackers to intercept, decrypt, modify, or impersonate secure communications.
-
E.
higher-layer protocol
A higher-layer protocol is a communication protocol that operates above the transport layer, defining application-specific message formats and interactions to enable end-user services over a network.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e634e9481908c9ba1b87ab87c26 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:11 p.m.