Triple
T36544321
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Acts of the New Zealand Parliament |
E901100
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayBeInconsistentWith |
P113448
|
FINISHED |
| Object | New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 | Statement: [Acts of the New Zealand Parliament, mayBeInconsistentWith, New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayBeInconsistentWith Context triple: [Acts of the New Zealand Parliament, mayBeInconsistentWith, New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990]
-
A.
isInconsistent
Indicates that there is a logical or factual contradiction within or between the entities or statements involved.
-
B.
foundInconsistentWith
Indicates that one entity has been determined to conflict with, contradict, or fail to align with another entity.
-
C.
mayDifferFrom
Indicates that one entity is allowed or expected to be different from another entity, without requiring them to be identical.
-
D.
allegedInconsistencyWith
chosen
Indicates a claimed or suspected contradiction or mismatch between one thing and another.
-
E.
mayFailToBeConservedIf
Indicates that something which is normally conserved might not remain conserved when a specified condition or circumstance holds.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e61217081908b79d610fe67b013 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcda3699948190adb57625bae08091 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcd8fd16d08190b0aca6e19a632e99 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:25 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:11 p.m.