Triple
T3653639
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cryptodira |
E77477
|
entity |
| Predicate | extant |
P50705
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Cryptodira, extant, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: extant Context triple: [Cryptodira, extant, true]
-
A.
extantLanguage
Indicates that a language currently exists or is in active use, as opposed to being extinct or only historically attested.
-
B.
extinct
Indicates that the referenced entity no longer exists as a living or active member of its former kind or category.
-
C.
existedUntil
Indicates that an entity continued to exist up to, but not necessarily beyond, a specified time or event.
-
D.
existedAs
Indicates that one entity had the status, form, or identity of another entity during a certain time or context.
-
E.
thoughtExtinct
Indicates that something was previously believed to no longer exist or to have died out, but is now recognized or suggested to still exist.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85def5cc8190863dccf55a18bebb |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc3b9164c81908938a4338430d193 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adb84650148190bf79231105e58d7f |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69adbae14d488190a6024548979c6faf |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:24 p.m.