Triple

T3640431
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Karl Popper E77174 entity
Predicate notableFor P22 FINISHED
Object theory of falsifiability E69412 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: theory of falsifiability | Statement: [Karl Popper, notableFor, theory of falsifiability]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: theory of falsifiability
Context triple: [Karl Popper, notableFor, theory of falsifiability]
  • A. falsificationism chosen
    Falsificationism is a philosophy of science, chiefly associated with Karl Popper, which holds that scientific theories can never be conclusively verified but can and should be rigorously tested and potentially refuted by empirical evidence.
  • B. Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
    Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes is a seminal philosophical work by Imre Lakatos that refines Karl Popper’s falsificationism by introducing the concept of competing scientific research programmes and criteria for their progressive or degenerative development.
  • C. The Logic of Scientific Discovery
    The Logic of Scientific Discovery is Karl Popper’s foundational philosophical work that introduces falsifiability as the key criterion distinguishing scientific theories from non-scientific ones.
  • D. Hempel's paradox
    Hempel's paradox is a famous problem in the philosophy of science that challenges our intuitions about confirmation by showing how evidence seemingly unrelated to a hypothesis can still count as confirming it.
  • E. logical positivism
    Logical positivism is a 20th-century philosophical movement that emphasizes the verification of statements through empirical observation and logical analysis, rejecting metaphysics as cognitively meaningless.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85dd0be48190b738990cb20c4731 completed March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adc357c3308190bd8801d68244a53e completed March 8, 2026, 6:43 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b44f2a8a5c8190b84dcf4b4b8a939e completed March 13, 2026, 5:53 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:24 p.m.