Triple
T36395992
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tractate Chagigah |
E896479
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAggadicContent |
P185433
|
FINISHED |
| Object | stories about sages |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: stories about sages | Statement: [Tractate Chagigah, hasAggadicContent, stories about sages]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAggadicContent Context triple: [Tractate Chagigah, hasAggadicContent, stories about sages]
-
A.
hasGemara
Indicates that an entity possesses, includes, or is associated with a Gemara (a Talmudic text or study component).
-
B.
includesMegillot
Indicates that one entity contains or encompasses the set of texts or items referred to as Megillot.
-
C.
containsParshiyot
Indicates that one textual or structural unit (such as a Torah scroll or section) includes within it one or more parshiyot (distinct Torah portions or sections).
-
D.
appearsInTractate
Indicates that one entity (such as a topic, law, or passage) is contained within or discussed in a particular tractate.
-
E.
associatedWithParashah
Indicates that one entity has a specified relationship, connection, or linkage to a particular parashah (a section of biblical text).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e52e3108190becf70b090ae7bd6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7be9d07ac8190adf796cbef60daf6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7bcccd7988190aa5c931ff347d33c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:23 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f7be9b9ab481908328e0e8d8ac73d4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:31 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:10 p.m.