Triple

T36377299
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Unoshima E895937 entity
Predicate hasSurroundingMunicipality P33892 FINISHED
Object Fujikawaguchiko NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fujikawaguchiko | Statement: [Unoshima, hasSurroundingMunicipality, Fujikawaguchiko]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSurroundingMunicipality
Context triple: [Unoshima, hasSurroundingMunicipality, Fujikawaguchiko]
  • A. neighbouringMunicipality chosen
    Indicates that one municipality directly borders and is adjacent to another municipality.
  • B. hasMunicipalityBoundaryRole
    Indicates that an entity participates in or is assigned a specific role related to the boundary of a municipality (such as defining, managing, or being affected by that boundary).
  • C. borderedByUrbanMunicipality
    Indicates that one entity shares a boundary with an urban municipality.
  • D. hasMunicipalPart
    Indicates that an administrative or territorial entity includes a municipality as one of its constituent parts.
  • E. hasMunicipalRelationshipWith
    Indicates a formal or functional connection between two municipalities, such as cooperation, partnership, or administrative association.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e51d358819092bbc5f119f49476 completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a00119d821c8190874786391b27ef23 completed May 10, 2026, 5:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a001143fb6881909ac0ae8bfea04351 completed May 10, 2026, 5:01 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:10 p.m.