Triple

T3632545
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Benjy Compson E76989 entity
Predicate chronologicalConfusion P49693 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Benjy Compson, chronologicalConfusion, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: chronologicalConfusion
Context triple: [Benjy Compson, chronologicalConfusion, yes]
  • A. chronologicalFunction
    Indicates a temporal relationship where one event or state functions to order, structure, or position another within a sequence of time.
  • B. chronologyNote
    Indicates a note that explains or clarifies the temporal order, dating, or sequence of related events or records.
  • C. chronologicalPosition
    Indicates the relative ordering of one event or entity in time with respect to another.
  • D. involvesChronology
    Indicates that the relationship or action explicitly depends on, references, or organizes events according to their order or position in time.
  • E. historicallyConfusedWith
    Indicates that one entity has been mistaken for or identified as another entity in historical records, interpretations, or traditions.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85dc03948190b35b7189e4175bcc completed March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adc30251d881908284edeb7fe69ad8 completed March 8, 2026, 6:42 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adb842be7c8190b7dfdb7c906f294c completed March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69adb902e61c81908f10494f828e260f completed March 8, 2026, 5:59 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:23 p.m.