Triple
T3630949
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015) |
E76951
|
entity |
| Predicate | partyStatusAtJudgment |
P39428
|
FINISHED |
| Object | respondent was Republic of Serbia |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: respondent was Republic of Serbia | Statement: [Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015), partyStatusAtJudgment, respondent was Republic of Serbia]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: partyStatusAtJudgment Context triple: [Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015), partyStatusAtJudgment, respondent was Republic of Serbia]
-
A.
defendantStatus
chosen
Indicates the legal condition or standing of a defendant within a judicial or law-enforcement process.
-
B.
judgmentInvolves
Indicates that a particular judgment, decision, or legal ruling includes, concerns, or pertains to a specified entity or matter.
-
C.
joinedByInJudgment
Indicates that one entity participates together with another entity in issuing or sharing a particular judgment or decision.
-
D.
hasJudge
Indicates that a legal case, proceeding, or decision is presided over or decided by a particular judge.
-
E.
finalDisposition
Indicates the ultimate outcome, status, or resolution assigned to an entity after all relevant processes or decisions are complete.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85dc03948190b35b7189e4175bcc |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc30136e88190922bb542971b5239 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adb8410a5881909c94818d7060b2b0 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:23 p.m.