Triple
T3625694
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ferdinand Bol |
E76832
|
entity |
| Predicate | spouse |
P13
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Anna van Erckel |
E76832
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Anna van Erckel | Statement: [Ferdinand Bol, spouse, Anna van Erckel]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Anna van Erckel Context triple: [Ferdinand Bol, spouse, Anna van Erckel]
-
A.
Anna van Erckel
chosen
Anna van Erckel was the wife of Dutch Golden Age painter Ferdinand Bol and a member of a prominent Amsterdam family.
-
B.
Maria van Aelst
Maria van Aelst was the wife of Dutch colonial governor-general Anthony van Diemen, associated with the Dutch East India Company’s activities in the 17th century.
-
C.
Maria van Oosterwijck
Maria van Oosterwijck was a 17th-century Dutch Golden Age painter renowned for her meticulously detailed and symbolically rich still-life flower paintings.
-
D.
Magdalena van Loo
Magdalena van Loo was the wife of Titus van Rijn, the only surviving son of the Dutch master painter Rembrandt.
-
E.
Saskia van Uylenburgh
Saskia van Uylenburgh was a 17th-century Dutch woman best known as Rembrandt’s wife and frequent model, who appeared in many of his most intimate and celebrated works.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85dc03948190b35b7189e4175bcc |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc2dae7a48190809d4455b2349aaa |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:41 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b4c3852e60819092db2992e945a4c7 |
completed | March 14, 2026, 2:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:23 p.m.