Triple
T362466
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Supreme Court of New Zealand |
E7885
|
entity |
| Predicate | finalCourtOfAppealFor |
P6120
|
FINISHED |
| Object | civil cases in New Zealand |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: civil cases in New Zealand | Statement: [Supreme Court of New Zealand, finalCourtOfAppealFor, civil cases in New Zealand]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: finalCourtOfAppealFor Context triple: [Supreme Court of New Zealand, finalCourtOfAppealFor, civil cases in New Zealand]
-
A.
highestCourtOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity is the supreme judicial authority or top-level court within the jurisdiction or legal system of another entity.
-
B.
wasOverturnedByCourt
Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or judgment was reversed or nullified by a court.
-
C.
judicialCapital
Indicates that a location serves as the primary seat of judicial authority or houses the main courts for a given region or jurisdiction.
-
D.
appealsFrom
Indicates that a decision, judgment, or ruling is being challenged and taken to a higher authority or court for review.
-
E.
hasLowerCourt
Indicates that one court functions as a subordinate or inferior court within the judicial hierarchy of another court.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7e880008190a6ad7e06e5d03007 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ebcfb0f48190b9a9010c7837ac58 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e95c843c8190b2aba9af6e869ba1 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.