Triple

T3621156
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Seven dirty words you can never say on television E76729 entity
Predicate influenced P9 FINISHED
Object FCC v. Pacifica Foundation E76730 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: FCC v. Pacifica Foundation | Statement: [Seven dirty words you can never say on television, influenced, FCC v. Pacifica Foundation]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
Context triple: [Seven dirty words you can never say on television, influenced, FCC v. Pacifica Foundation]
  • A. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation chosen
    FCC v. Pacifica Foundation is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the government's authority to regulate indecent material on public airwaves, stemming from a radio broadcast of George Carlin's "Seven Dirty Words" monologue.
  • B. United States v. Washington Post Co.
    United States v. Washington Post Co. is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that, alongside New York Times Co. v. United States, upheld the press’s right to publish the Pentagon Papers against prior restraint by the government.
  • C. New York Times Co. v. United States
    New York Times Co. v. United States is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the press’s right to publish the Pentagon Papers, sharply limiting the government’s power to impose prior restraint on the media.
  • D. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
    New York Times Co. v. Sullivan is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the “actual malice” standard, greatly expanding First Amendment protections for the press in defamation cases involving public officials.
  • E. Brandenburg v. Ohio
    Brandenburg v. Ohio is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly strengthened free speech protections by establishing the "imminent lawless action" test for when advocacy of violence can be punished under the First Amendment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85dae2fc81908d1ceadbc6af0089 completed March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adc2b9aa608190a680b250ecf63156 completed March 8, 2026, 6:40 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b44f0e8d1c8190ae1728d07d5a9e87 completed March 13, 2026, 5:53 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:23 p.m.