Triple
T36182575
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eerie, Indiana |
E1046754
|
entity |
| Predicate | cultStatusDevelopedAfter |
P185004
|
FINISHED |
| Object | syndicated reruns in the mid-1990s |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: syndicated reruns in the mid-1990s | Statement: [Eerie, Indiana, cultStatusDevelopedAfter, syndicated reruns in the mid-1990s]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: cultStatusDevelopedAfter Context triple: [Eerie, Indiana, cultStatusDevelopedAfter, syndicated reruns in the mid-1990s]
-
A.
hasDevelopmentStatus
Indicates the current stage or condition of progress or completion that something is in.
-
B.
developedThrough
Indicates that something came into existence, was created, or was brought to its current form by means of a specified process, method, or developmental pathway.
-
C.
cultDevelopedInto
Indicates that one cult evolved, transformed, or was reconstituted into another cult over time.
-
D.
developed
Indicates that one entity created, designed, or brought another entity into a more advanced or complete state through effort or work.
-
E.
developedOverPeriod
Indicates that something was created, expanded, or progressed continuously throughout a specified span of time.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e3c1b10819081fc7a807a71cf84 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7b69b333081909cadbed3fcb8ecf5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7b4c2a5f8819094ad4621d7b97e0c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:49 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f7b69a74a08190b31b1201278a2c57 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:56 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:08 p.m.