Triple
T36151479
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | pairing heap |
E1045596
|
entity |
| Predicate | timeComplexityMeld |
P27167
|
FINISHED |
| Object | O(1) amortized |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: O(1) amortized | Statement: [pairing heap, timeComplexityMeld, O(1) amortized]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: timeComplexityMeld Context triple: [pairing heap, timeComplexityMeld, O(1) amortized]
-
A.
timeComplexity
chosen
Indicates the computational growth rate of an algorithm’s resource usage (typically time) as a function of input size.
-
B.
spaceComplexity
Indicates the relationship between an algorithm and the amount of memory it requires as a function of input size.
-
C.
canMerge
Indicates that two or more entities are compatible in such a way that they can be combined into a single unified entity or structure.
-
D.
parameterizedComplexity
Indicates that the relationship or action is analyzed or characterized in terms of its computational complexity as a function of one or more explicit parameters.
-
E.
mergedBy
Indicates that one entity is combined or integrated into another entity through the action or decision of a specific agent.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e37ace88190a906b107d388f5d1 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7b69b333081909cadbed3fcb8ecf5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7b4c2a5f8819094ad4621d7b97e0c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:49 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:08 p.m.