Triple
T36096774
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | DM |
E1044083
|
entity |
| Predicate | compatibleDockingSystem |
P184674
|
FINISHED |
| Object | APAS-89 |
E451991
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: APAS-89 | Statement: [DM, compatibleDockingSystem, APAS-89]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: compatibleDockingSystem Context triple: [DM, compatibleDockingSystem, APAS-89]
-
A.
dockingSystemCompatibility
chosen
Indicates that two docking systems are capable of physically connecting and operating together as intended.
-
B.
dockingSystem
Indicates a relationship where one structure or vehicle is equipped with or connected to a system that enables secure docking with another compatible structure or vehicle.
-
C.
hasDockingCapability
Indicates that an entity is capable of connecting or docking with another compatible entity or system.
-
D.
intendedDockingPartner
Indicates that one entity is designated or expected to connect, interface, or dock with a specific counterpart as its planned partner.
-
E.
docking
Indicates the action of one vehicle or structure aligning and securely connecting to another for transfer, access, or support.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e32d60c8190ba781ffaaab4aa3d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd5f29b1988190877764ef2a399c7f |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:57 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a38d54aab248190a865e10399e92f5a |
completed | June 22, 2026, 6:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd5e30194c819085b5ce586122ab37 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:53 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:08 p.m.